| Many from this part of the country ask that same question. Because the name is so unfamiliar and unusual, some even wonder if we are a cult. Once we begin to introduce ourselves, however, most come to realize that they are more familiar with the C&MA than they initially thought, even if they do not recognize the name.
Anyone who has ever been involved in overseas missions, for example, has probably at least heard of the C&MA, because we are one of the premier missionary-sending movements in the world. Now that’s quite a claim to make, especially when one compares our total number of missionaries to those serving in several other missions-oriented denominations. In the latter part of the twentieth century, for example, Southern Baptists had 4077 foreign missionaries, while both the Assemblies of God and the Conservative Baptists also supported more missionaries than the C&MA, which at that same time supported 1,180 full-time foreign missionaries.
On the face of it, when one looks at it in these terms, it looks like we are way behind. So how can it be true to say that we are one of the premier missionary-sending movements in the world?
The answer is found when one compares the ratio of North American church members to foreign missionaries supported. In a study reported by Patrick Johnstone in his 1987 book, Operation World, the following statistics were given: The Southern Baptist church had one missionary for every 670 members, while the Conservative Baptists had one missionary for every 300 members. By comparison, the C&MA ratio at the time of the study was one missionary for every 125 members.
Moreover, our commitment to giving in support of
missions, and our commitment to seeing that the largest
percentage of that money actually goes to what it was
given for, also reflects our leadership in Christian
missions. For example, the December 4th, 1995, cover
story of the U.S. News and World Report listed the C&MA
among the “50 Favorite American Charities.” The Alliance
was number seven in the religious category. In the
overall ranking of program ratio (i.e., percentage of administrative costs compared to actual funding of programs), the C&MA ranked fifth among the 50 charities, with 92.6 percent. By comparison, Focus on the Family’s program ratio was 85.2 percent, Campus Crusade’s was 85.3 percent, and the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association was 86.6 percent.
This independent report reinforces several realities about our ministry focus and integrity. First, it shows that we work hard at keeping overhead low, turning as many dollars as possible into ministry. Second, it shows that we are diligent in managing our finances in an ethical and open manner. Our internal accounting standards are actually higher than those required by the Evangelical Council on Financial Accountability (ECFA), of which we are a member.
This fiscal integrity goes all the way back to the days of our founder, Dr. A.B. Simpson, who had as key colleagues several leading businessmen in New York City. One such individual was “Honest David Crear,” the movement’s first treasurer. Crear was the
connected to the building of the New York Life and the Metropolitan Insurance buildings, and was given the title “Honest” by the business world in recognition of his integrity.
Perhaps the most important message drawn from the U.S. News and World Report ranking is the fact that Alliance people know how to give. When asked to give for the work of world evangelization and church planting, we respond! In the words of Dr. David Hasselgrave, professor emeritus of Missions at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, “To be sure, the Alliance does not stand alone; but it does stand out.” The C&MA is known around the world for its quite, yet effective work of world-evangelization.
Another reason why the C&MA is not well known in this part of the country is because the Alliance is a movement that began in the northeast and primarily moved westward along a northern corridor. In states like New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, C&MA churches are as common and familiar as Southern Baptist churches are in Texas. States like Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, the Dakotas, and Montana have also seen a rapid expansion of the Alliance’s work.
Moreover, because our focus has primarily been oversees missions and church planting, this is where most of our attention has been directed, and where our largest constituency exists (church growth statistics from 2001 show that inclusive membership in the C&MA overseas is 2,854,932, while inclusive membership here in the USA is 381,677). For many years it was felt that America already had a strong witness for Christ, so the greatest need was overseas. When a good evangelical witness was already present in sufficient numbers in a particular area here at home, the Alliance would look to plant its churches elsewhere. More recently, however, the moral and spiritual decline of our own country has resulted in a renewed focus on our mission at home as well.
Finally, those not familiar with the work of the Alliance overseas are probably at least familiar with the names of the following individuals, whose influence has reached far beyond the C&MA: |